117 research outputs found
Journal Staff
With the proliferation of ontologies and their use in semantically-enabled applications, the issue of finding and repairing defects in ontologies has become increasingly important. Current work mostly targets debugging semantic defects in ontologies. In our work, we focus on another kind of severe defects, modeling defects, which require domain knowledge to detect and resolve. In particular, we debug the missing structural relations (is-a hierarchy) in a fundamental kind of ontologies, i.e. taxonomies. The context of our study is an ontology network consisting of several taxonomies networked by partial reference alignments. We use the ontology network as domain knowledge to detect the missing is-a relations in these ontologies. We also propose algorithms to generate possible repairing actions, rank missing is-a relations, recommend and execute repairing actions. Further, we discuss an implemented system RepOSE and experiments on ontologies of the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative and the Finnish Ontology Library Service
Completing and Debugging Ontologies: state of the art and challenges
As semantically-enabled applications require high-quality ontologies,
developing and maintaining ontologies that are as correct and complete as
possible is an important although difficult task in ontology engineering. A key
step is ontology debugging and completion. In general, there are two steps:
detecting defects and repairing defects. In this paper we discuss the state of
the art regarding the repairing step. We do this by formalizing the repairing
step as an abduction problem and situating the state of the art with respect to
this framework. We show that there are still many open research problems and
show opportunities for further work and advancing the field.Comment: 56 page
An Ontology for the Materials Design Domain
In the materials design domain, much of the data from materials calculations
are stored in different heterogeneous databases. Materials databases usually
have different data models. Therefore, the users have to face the challenges to
find the data from adequate sources and integrate data from multiple sources.
Ontologies and ontology-based techniques can address such problems as the
formal representation of domain knowledge can make data more available and
interoperable among different systems. In this paper, we introduce the
Materials Design Ontology (MDO), which defines concepts and relations to cover
knowledge in the field of materials design. MDO is designed using domain
knowledge in materials science (especially in solid-state physics), and is
guided by the data from several databases in the materials design field. We
show the application of the MDO to materials data retrieved from well-known
materials databases.Comment: 16 page
Alignment Cubes: Towards Interactive Visual Exploration and Evaluation of Multiple Ontology Alignments
Ontology alignment is an area of active research where many algorithms and approaches are being developed. Their performance is usually evaluated by comparing the produced alignments to a reference alignment in terms of precision, recall and F-measure. These measures, however, only provide an overall assessment of the quality of the alignments, but do not reveal differences and commonalities between alignments at a finer-grained level such as, e.g., regions or individual mappings. Furthermore, reference alignments are often unavailable, which makes the comparative exploration of alignments at different levels of granularity even more important. Making such comparisons efficient calls for a “human-in-the-loop” approach, best supported through interactive visual representations of alignments. Our approach extends a recent tool, Matrix Cubes, used for visualizing dense dynamic networks. We first identify use cases for ontology alignment evaluation that can benefit from interactive visualization, and then detail how our Alignment Cubes support interactive exploration of multiple ontology alignments. We demonstrate the usefulness of Alignment Cubes by describing visual exploration scenarios, showing how Alignment Cubes support common tasks identified in the use cases
Results of the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative 2015
cheatham2016aInternational audienceOntology matching consists of finding correspondences between semantically related entities of two ontologies. OAEI campaigns aim at comparing ontology matching systems on precisely defined test cases. These test cases can use ontologies of different nature (from simple thesauri to expressive OWL ontologies) and use different modalities, e.g., blind evaluation, open evaluation and consensus. OAEI 2015 offered 8 tracks with 15 test cases followed by 22 participants. Since 2011, the campaign has been using a new evaluation modality which provides more automation to the evaluation. This paper is an overall presentation of the OAEI 2015 campaign
Results of the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative 2014
dragisic2014aInternational audienceOntology matching consists of finding correspondences between semantically related entities of two ontologies. OAEI campaigns aim at comparing ontology matching systems on precisely defined test cases. These test cases can use ontologies of different nature (from simple thesauri to expressive OWL ontologies) and use different modalities, e.g., blind evaluation, open evaluation and consensus. OAEI 2014 offered 7 tracks with 9 test cases followed by 14 participants. Since 2010, the campaign has been using a new evaluation modality which provides more automation to the evaluation. This paper is an overall presentation of the OAEI 2014 campaign
Recommended from our members
Results of the ontology alignment evaluation initiative 2020
The Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative (OAEI) aims at comparing ontology matching systems on precisely defined test cases. These test cases can be based on ontologies of different levels of complexity and use different evaluation modalities (e.g., blind evaluation, open evaluation, or consensus). The OAEI 2020 campaign offered 12 tracks with 36 test cases, and was attended by 19 participants. This paper is an overall presentation of that campaign
Results of the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative 2021
The Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative (OAEI) aims at comparing ontology matching systems on precisely defined test cases. These test cases can be based on ontologies of different levels of complexity and use different evaluation modalities (e.g., blind evaluation, open evaluation, or consensus). The OAEI 2021 campaign offered 13 tracks and was attended by 21 participants. This paper is an overall presentation of that campaig
- …